RE: the title being misleading

Although "criticism" does have some negative connotations, one of it's definitions is "a serious examination and judgment of something". So in this respect, the title is accurate -- i.e. it is a serious examination of the question of violence.

Or perhaps the author meant to be misleading, so that dogmatic pacifists wouldn't just be like "Oh my Dogma! A pamphlet promoting violence? I'm not going to read that!"



The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Incorrect please try again
Enter the words above: Enter the numbers you hear: