my problem with this article

is that it intentionally doesn't mention anarchy until you see the suggested links at the end. I feel this article would be more powerful if it explained anarchist ideas explicitly at every point. It seems a little misleading to leave the word anarchy out and kind of assumes the audience is homogenized and quantifiable like what corporate media does to sell avertizing. Anarchists can do better than using the corporate media tactic of reducing people to narrow ideas, however misleading those ideas may be.

Most anarchist writing today doesn't address the false liberation arguments imposed on poor people in North America. How various interests prey on poor people and co-opt their community leaders.

One argument against bigotry that I find my self referring to is that discrimination allows the boss to pay you less by setting you up to compete with everyone you discriminate against for jobs, housing, place in the hierarchy, etc. including competing against women in your own family.

How can anyone be free when we pay for everything?


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Incorrect please try again
Enter the words above: Enter the numbers you hear: