This is empty abuse not

This is empty abuse not criticism. Why should a coming together of revolutionaries dedicated to modernized revolutionary struggle against contemporary affluent capitalism be against the spirit of the situationists? Are we supposed to think that the situationists were content to see their theories and objectives consigned to the grave (or the university - much the same thing) when they split up in 1972?

Keep in mind that the author is merely suggested a new international association of situationist revolutionaries, not the reinstitution of The Situationist International.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Incorrect please try again
Enter the words above: Enter the numbers you hear: