This document's historical facts are, as far as I can tell, accurate and dispassionate. I learned a lot from it.

On the other hand, the document's conclusions are not supported by the facts.

For example, "Israel was to blame for the violence of Hamas." It is clear that Israel contributed to the rise of Hamas, but it is logically invalid to conclude that Israel was to blame for the violence of Hamas. Hamas was to blame for the violence of Hamas.

Also, there is no justification presented for the idea that statism is responsible for the current situation. I can accept that cold war policy models were highly contributory, but not the idea os statism itself.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Incorrect please try again
Enter the words above: Enter the numbers you hear: